---
title: "Jet Bark vs Trevor Hunter: slots compared · gambatracker"
description: "Studio facts are shown where the studio lists the game. Independent and free, no sign-up. Figures from public feeds and chains."
url: https://gambatracker.com/slots/compare/jet-bark-vs-trevor-hunter
rendered: 2026-11-12T02:48Z
---

[Slots](https://gambatracker.com/slots) / [Compare](https://gambatracker.com/slots/compare) / [Jet Bark vs Trevor Hunter](https://gambatracker.com/slots/compare/jet-bark-vs-trevor-hunter)

# Jet Bark vs Trevor Hunter

Side by side: what each studio publishes about its game, and what the sampled bet feeds showed over 30 days. Observed figures are past results of a sample and say nothing about the next spin.

[Change slots](https://gambatracker.com/slots/compare)

| Row | [Jet Bark Zerplaay Games](https://gambatracker.com/slots/jet-bark) | [Trevor Hunter Zerplaay Games](https://gambatracker.com/slots/trevor-hunter) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| From the studio each studio’s own site, read weekly |  |  |
| RTP versions as the studio lists them | — | — |
| Volatility the studio’s own label | — | — |
| Max win times the bet | — | — |
| Bet range | — | — |
| Layout | — | — |
| Studio release date as the studio dates it | — | — |
| Features | — | — |
| Free demo the studio’s own, play money | — | — |
| Observed, 30 days the bets the casinos’ public feeds showed, a sample |  |  |
| Observed RTP paid ÷ wagered, 95% band | 145.71% ±68.4 526 bets · below the minimum sample | 138.01% ±80.5 106 bets · below the minimum sample |
| Bets sampled | 526 | 106 |
| Wagered sampled | $3,033 | $583 |
| Max multiplier all sampled bets | 536.9x | 421.3x |
| Hit rate spins that paid anything | 37% 526 spins | 35% 129 spins |
| Swings spread of the multiplier against tracked slots | not ranked | not ranked |
| Max win hits bets that reached the studio’s max win | — | — |
| Casinos with sampled bets on it, 30 days | 5 | 5 |

Green marks the highest RTP a studio publishes, and the highest observed RTP only when every slot has enough sampled bets and its 95% band sits clear of the others’; overlapping bands are one result, not a ranking. The smallest sample here is 129 spins; a small sample swings a lot, and every spin is independent. Every other row is shown as read, with nothing ranked. [How we measure →](https://gambatracker.com/methodology)

## What this page is · and what it is not

Jet Bark and Trevor Hunter side by side: the facts each studio publishes about its game, and what the public bet feeds of the tracked casinos showed on it over the last 30 days. The studio rows are read from the studios’ own sites; a dash means the studio does not list the figure. The observed rows are sums over the sampled bets, so a game played on more casinos we read has a bigger sample, and the 95% band says how much the observed RTP could move on a sample that size.

None of it is a recommendation. A higher observed RTP over 30 days is what happened in that sample; every spin is independent, and no past figure changes the odds of the next one.

## The games · each one’s own page

[Jet Bark Zerplaay Games 145.71%](https://gambatracker.com/slots/jet-bark) [Trevor Hunter Zerplaay Games 138.01%](https://gambatracker.com/slots/trevor-hunter)

18+

**These are past, observed results.** Every spin and round is independent: a hot or cold streak says nothing about what happens next, and no figure on this site improves anyone's odds. Gambling can be harmful.

[BeGambleAware](https://www.begambleaware.org/) [Gamblers Anonymous](https://www.gamblersanonymous.org/) [Help & limits](https://gambatracker.com/responsible-gambling)

How these figures are produced and labelled: https://gambatracker.com/llms.txt