20 Vampire Beast vs 40 Burning Hot

Side by side: what each studio publishes about its game, and what the sampled bet feeds showed over 30 days. Observed figures are past results of a sample and say nothing about the next spin.

Row
From the studioeach studio’s own site, read weekly
RTP versionsas the studio lists them96.05%95.93%
Volatilitythe studio’s own label2/5 (low–medium)3/5 (medium)
Max wintimes the betStudio figure not shown: sampled bets have gone past it75× bet
Bet range——
Layout5 × 3 · 20 lines5 × 4 · 40 lines
Studio release dateas the studio dates itFeb 2025Sep 2017
Features
  • Multipliers
  • Expanding wilds
  • Jackpot
  • Gamble
  • Jackpot
  • Gamble
Free demothe studio’s own, play money——
Observed, 30 daysthe bets the casinos’ public feeds showed, a sample
Observed RTPpaid ÷ wagered, 95% band1048.46%±205.6354 bets · below the minimum sample110.59%±12.720.9K bets
Betssampled35420,921
Wageredsampled$369$244K
Max multiplierall sampled bets369.0x606.3x
Hit ratespins that paid anything91%354 spins23%21,237 spins
Swingsspread of the multiplier against tracked slotsnot rankedhigher than 10% of 155 tracked slots
Max win hitsbets that reached the studio’s max win——
Casinoswith sampled bets on it, 30 days14
Green marks the highest RTP a studio publishes, and the highest observed RTP only when every slot has enough sampled bets and its 95% band sits clear of the others’; overlapping bands are one result, not a ranking. The smallest sample here is 354 spins; a small sample swings a lot, and every spin is independent. Every other row is shown as read, with nothing ranked.How we measure →

What this page isand what it is not

20 Vampire Beast and 40 Burning Hot side by side: the facts each studio publishes about its game, and what the public bet feeds of the tracked casinos showed on it over the last 30 days. The studio rows are read from the studios’ own sites; a dash means the studio does not list the figure. The observed rows are sums over the sampled bets, so a game played on more casinos we read has a bigger sample, and the 95% band says how much the observed RTP could move on a sample that size.

None of it is a recommendation. A higher observed RTP over 30 days is what happened in that sample; every spin is independent, and no past figure changes the odds of the next one.

The gameseach one’s own page