Nip Tuckslots
Observed RTP vs officialpaid ÷ wagered over the sampled bets, with a 95% band
The marker is the RTP each casino publishes for this game. An amber bar means that figure is outside the 95% band of what we observed there; grey bars are below the minimum sample.
This gameall sampled bets
- Bets
- 262
- Wagered
- $2,123
- Paid
- $4,823
- Max multiplier
- 381.8x
- Max payout
- $1,527
too earlyNot enough bets over 30d to compare with the official RTP yet. Every spin is independent.
Official RTPas published by each casino
Multiplier distribution30d, sampled bets
50 sampled spins, 24% of them paid something.
- 0 spins
- paid 10x+ in this sample
- 0 spins
- paid 100x+ in this sample
- 0 spins
- paid 1000x+ in this sample
0
0-1
1-2
2-5
5-10
10-50
50-100
100-1000
1000+
- Observed swings
- Compared once a slot has 20,000 sampled spins staked $0.10 or more in this window; this one has 46.
From 50 sampled spins; a small sample swings a lot, and every spin is independent. Bar height is square-root scaled so the rare high buckets stay visible. Hover a bar for the count.
Where it is played30d, share of sampled wagering
When players play30d · sampled bets by UTC hour and weekday, since 2 Nov 2026
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
by hour
Busiest hour: Tue 17:00–18:00 UTC with 59 bets; busiest time of day: 17:00–18:00 UTC; busiest day: Tue. Observed on the public feeds we read, a sample: when people were seen playing, not when anyone should. Hours are UTC.
Biggest hitslargest payouts we saw on this game
Live RTP by casino30d, refreshes on reload
About Nip Tuckfrom the figures on this page
Nip Tuck is a Sneaky Slots slot. Over the last 30 days we observed 262 bets on it at 8 casinos, too few to measure its RTP over 30 days; the official RTP is 95.68%. Its highest multiplier in the last 30 days was 381.8x. The biggest win we saw on it paid $1,527 (381.8x) at Rakebit on 5 Nov 2026. Over the last 30 days it was played most, by wager, at Rainbet, Goated and BC.Game.
More from Sneaky Slots30 days, by observed wagering
Gopnik$2,095
Compare with